R Kelly Might Have a Problem

R Kelly's child pornography trial has officially started and for the record, this is not the same one from back in 2003 (I thought it was at first too). I understand people being confused though, because back then he was nailed for 12 counts of child pornography from pictures of him having sex with minor. This time there's a video tape that was mailed in by some unknown person that features Kelly supposedly having sex with a 13-year-old girl.

The body of evidence in the R.Kelly kiddie-porn case could come down to this: a mole on the R&B raunchmeister's back.

During opening arguments in his sex-tape trial Tuesday, the defense said the singer couldn't possibly be the man who cavorted with a girl as young as 13.

Kelly, 41, has a "significant" mole on his lower middle back, one that's been there since childhood, said lawyer Sam Adam Jr.

And the man seen performing a variety of explicit sex acts on the raw video made between 1998 and 2000?

"There is no mole on his back," Adam told jurors in a packed Chicago courtroom.

"Robert Kelly is not on that tape. ... Not a single witness can tell you that is him on the tape."

The defense also claimed the girl on the tape is not the same person prosecutors have identified as the victim. They say the person on the tape is a prostitute.

Kelly's supposed sex partner - who was between 13 and 15 at the time - also denies she's on the video.

Source

Remember, this is the same guy that discovered the singer Aaliyah and they secretly married when she was 15. Guess what? She ended up making a hit album he produced called Age Ain't Nothin' But A Number. That's what Scooby and the gang call a clue folks. Both camps denied the marriage happened, but Vibe magazine actually published a marriage certificate for them at one time.

If you add up all of these little misunderstandings of the upstanding R Kelly, I'm starting to think he might have a thing for young girls.

Popularity of this post: 1%